tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post7878276897935172865..comments2023-10-10T12:33:43.016-04:00Comments on A Bad Case of the Dates: Time for New RelativesJMGhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/18362998962851574254noreply@blogger.comBlogger19125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-84265453289748081602016-05-29T18:18:08.056-04:002016-05-29T18:18:08.056-04:00YOU WOULDN'T HAVE REPLIED IF YOU SAW WHAT I AC...YOU WOULDN'T HAVE REPLIED IF YOU SAW WHAT I ACTUALLY LOOK LIKE!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06860982982263235946noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-41738237108596618522010-07-15T16:57:15.387-04:002010-07-15T16:57:15.387-04:00@s and semicolons aside, I think you all should us...@s and semicolons aside, I think you all should use more "that that" and "had had"s (sp?). I think that that makes a more interesting sentence. If I had had more of "that that" then I probably would have been giddy that I had had such a well constructed sentence.cluracan13noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-80270002918065766432010-07-14T20:41:14.192-04:002010-07-14T20:41:14.192-04:00Crazy as a shithouse rat.Crazy as a shithouse rat.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-13899929681185685152010-07-14T12:42:40.370-04:002010-07-14T12:42:40.370-04:00I think using @ is a pretty accepted practice and ...I think using @ is a pretty accepted practice and (assuming it's ok with Jared) decree that it is perfectly fine and should never again be questioned. There you go, one less thing to worry about.The Architecthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11647156183428925648noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-32834250792402431812010-07-14T09:29:26.089-04:002010-07-14T09:29:26.089-04:00@3:05, in my head, I say "at 3:05" as we...@3:05, in my head, I say "at 3:05" as well, and still use it. I like to think of it as "My comment is directed 'at 3:05'". Same on Twitter.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-63753823680162525782010-07-13T17:16:50.887-04:002010-07-13T17:16:50.887-04:00Pretty standard stalker, more of a bullet grave th...Pretty standard stalker, more of a bullet grave than a dodge...Clive Warrennoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-36238220388760980872010-07-13T16:11:24.506-04:002010-07-13T16:11:24.506-04:00^ Using "@" before a person's name (...^ Using "@" before a person's name (or, in the case of anonymous posters, its time stamp) is a Twitter thing. It's supposed to let the poster know that you are directing your comment to them.Claire (and Nikki)https://www.blogger.com/profile/03946625511421997222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-65535982431532568802010-07-13T03:05:09.733-04:002010-07-13T03:05:09.733-04:00at12:23
Word.
p.s. wtf is up with using @ to re...at12:23<br /><br />Word.<br /><br /><br />p.s. wtf is up with using @ to respond to people? It reads like I wrote aboveAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-81387595954910123482010-07-12T20:39:50.709-04:002010-07-12T20:39:50.709-04:00@6:14, you use WAY TOO FEW SEMICOLONS! Please star...@6:14, you use WAY TOO FEW SEMICOLONS! Please start using them; they can make a boring sentence fun again.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-90050584804905314622010-07-12T19:41:34.314-04:002010-07-12T19:41:34.314-04:00beam me up scottybeam me up scottyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-41584813844436492202010-07-12T18:56:28.171-04:002010-07-12T18:56:28.171-04:00I'm really surprised you went through with the...I'm really surprised you went through with the date at all - stalkers suck. <br /><br />A word of maybe unwanted advice, if she keeps it up I wouldn't fuck around - just call the cops. If she is harmless, the cops intervention will embarrass here into stopping. If she's not, you'll have a record of behavior. <br /><br />And I agree with 12:23, find out what the relative said about you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-45894038728989189512010-07-12T18:14:00.335-04:002010-07-12T18:14:00.335-04:00Anonymous 12:23...
You use WAY TOO MANY COMMAS. ...Anonymous 12:23...<br /><br />You use WAY TOO MANY COMMAS. Please stop it, you're hurting me.kate the greatnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-14239673991311430172010-07-12T12:28:20.400-04:002010-07-12T12:28:20.400-04:00Jerk. LolJerk. LolAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-53883831389601760022010-07-12T12:23:33.498-04:002010-07-12T12:23:33.498-04:00Time to have a talk with your cousin's wife! W...Time to have a talk with your cousin's wife! Who the hell volunteers information about family members, to people who randomly phone you? Did she give out your credit card information, and bank account numbers? That someone you know went along with this, is as weird as the date itself.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-56485338806573286782010-07-12T12:19:15.764-04:002010-07-12T12:19:15.764-04:00LOL @ Nom!
OP, you know why she didn't talk t...LOL @ Nom!<br /><br />OP, you know why she didn't talk to you for a month? It takes a while to stalk someone long enough to get a urine sample and those damn background checks take forever to come back. But hey, at least you're good enough for a stalker. Take comfort in that...and keep a gun close by.The Architecthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11647156183428925648noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-25796569545357673112010-07-12T11:32:58.282-04:002010-07-12T11:32:58.282-04:00Calling up one's relatives and being a general...Calling up one's relatives and being a general weirdo is 'far too common for internet dates to even appear here'? I've done a lot of internet dating over the years and met some strange people but this has NEVER happened to me!babyforresthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03570266293266499129noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-75545395251479196332010-07-12T11:16:57.331-04:002010-07-12T11:16:57.331-04:00So, the internet access from the bottom of her bas...So, the internet access from the bottom of her basement in her killing room is good then?nomatophobiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17765718970953715165noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-51927960557267487642010-07-12T10:06:50.487-04:002010-07-12T10:06:50.487-04:00Boring story...far too common for internet dates t...Boring story...far too common for internet dates to even appear hereAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3186499665856075184.post-33682273091769709072010-07-12T09:49:24.040-04:002010-07-12T09:49:24.040-04:00so she was a massive stalker and your major compla...so she was a massive stalker and your major complaint was with her outdated profile photo? you did not dodge a bullet here. The bullet will be finding you again sometime very soon I'm sure.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com